|
Success
comes in cans!
Some
said, “It can’t be done!” But “Success comes in CANS,
not in cannots!”
The first
successful cast iron plow invented in the United States
in 1797 was rejected by New Jersey farmers under the
theory that cast iron poisoned the land and stimulated
growth of weeds.
In Germany, it
was “proven” by experts that if trains went at the
frightful speed of 15 miles per hour, blood would spurt
from the travelers’ noses, and that the passengers would
suffocate going through tunnels.
Commodore
Vanderbilt dismissed Westinghouse and his new air brakes
for trains with the remark that he had no time to waste
on fools.
Those who
loaned Robert Fulton money for his steamboat project
stipulated that their names be withheld for fear of
ridicule were it known that they supported anything so
“foolhardy.”
In 1881, when
the New York YWCA announced typing lessons for women,
vigorous protests were made on the grounds that the
female constitution would break down under the strain.
Men insisted
that iron ships would not float, that they would damage
more easily than wooden ships when grounding, that it
would be difficult to preserve the iron bottoms from
rust, and that iron would deflect the compass.
Joshua
Coppersmith was arrested in Boston for trying to sell
stock in the telephone. “All well-informed people know
that it is impossible to transmit the human voice over a
wire.”
The editor of
the Springfield Republican refused an invitation to ride
in an early automobile, claiming it was incompatible
with the dignity of his position.
Chauncey M.
Depew confessed that he warned his nephew not to invest
$5,000 in Ford stocks because “nothing has come along to
beat the horse.”
In 1907, when
DeForest put the radio tube in workable form, he was not
able to sell his patent and so let it lapse rather than
pay $25 for its renewal.
Henry Morton,
the president of Stevens Institute of Technology,
protested against the trumpeting of results of Edison’s
experiments in electric lighting as a “wonderful
success” when “everyone acquainted with the subject will
recognize it as a conspicuous failure.”
|